Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanan karara g\u00f6re, Tarsus 1. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi, hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edilen yeti\u015fkinlere vasi atanmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren s\u00f6z konusu maddelerin, anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptal isteminde bulundu.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuruda, bir y\u0131l ve daha fazla s\u00fcre hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lanlar\u0131n yard\u0131ma ihtiyac\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda da kendilerine vasi atand\u0131\u011f\u0131, hapis halinin sona ermesiyle bu durumun kendili\u011finden kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak \u201chapis halinin sona ermesinden\u201d ifadesinin belirsizli\u011fe neden oldu\u011fu ifade edildi.<\/p>\n
Bundan dolay\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkilendi\u011fi, ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hukuki i\u015flemlerinin uzun s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilerek, uygulaman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35, 48 ve 49. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Talebi karara ba\u011flayan y\u00fcksek mahkeme, s\u00f6z konusu uygulaman\u0131n, yerel mahkemenin g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi anayasa maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 407 ve 471. maddelerinin iptaline karar verdi.<\/p>\n
M\u00dcLK\u0130YET VE \u00d6ZEL HAYAT HAKKINI SINIRLIYOR<\/strong><\/p>\n Oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nan kararda, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ihlal edilmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in anayasal g\u00fcvence sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131larak, ki\u015filerin yine yasa gere\u011fi m\u00fclkiyet edinme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n Kararda, yeti\u015fkin ve ayr\u0131t etme g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip ki\u015filerin, 1 y\u0131l veya daha uzun s\u00fcre hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edilmeleri halinde, mutlak suretle vesayet alt\u0131na al\u0131nmalar\u0131n\u0131n (vasi atanmas\u0131), \u00f6zel hayat ile m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. maddesinde \u201ctemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, \u00f6zlerine dokunulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaln\u0131zca anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, anayasan\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve ruhuna, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin ve laik cumhuriyetin gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne i\u015faret edilen kararda, \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin \u015feklen var olmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olmayaca\u011f\u0131, kurallar\u0131n, keyfili\u011fe izin vermeyecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikte olmas\u0131n\u0131n zaruri oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edildi.<\/p>\n VAS\u0130N\u0130N RIZASI OLMADIK\u00c7A\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n Mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 hukuki i\u015flemleri yapamayaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye kanun gere\u011fince vasi atanmas\u0131, ki\u015fiyi korumaya y\u00f6nelik bir uygulama oldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131lan kararda, ancak bu ki\u015filerin ay\u0131rt etme g\u00fcc\u00fcne haiz ve herhangi bir vasi atanmaks\u0131z\u0131n kendi i\u015flemlerini y\u00fcr\u00fctebilecek durumda olduklar\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn, i\u015flemlerini g\u00f6rebilecek durumda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmeksizin vasi atanmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 bir uygulamay\u0131 beraberinde getirece\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle vasinin r\u0131zas\u0131 olmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn kendi i\u015flemleriyle bor\u00e7 alt\u0131na giremeyece\u011fi, mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik i\u015flemlerde izin almadan hareket edemeyece\u011fi, ni\u015fanlanma ve evlenme gibi i\u015flemler i\u00e7in dahi \u00f6ncelikle vasinin r\u0131zas\u0131 aranaca\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zel hayat\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilece\u011fi vurgulanan kararda, \u015fu de\u011ferlendirmeye yer verildi:<\/p>\n \u201cBu ba\u011flamda kuralla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekten korunmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren durumlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ancak b\u00f6yle bir durumun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde vesayet karar\u0131 verilmesi hususunda mahkemeye takdir hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmamakta ya da ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ergin ve ay\u0131rt etme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle vesayete g\u00f6re ki\u015finin ehliyetini daha az s\u0131n\u0131rlayan ve daha dar koruma sa\u011flayan yasal dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k ve kayy\u0131ml\u0131k atamas\u0131na imkan sa\u011flanmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kural\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n zorunlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ayn\u0131 amaca daha hafif bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama ile ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu nedenle kuralla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye zorunlu olarak vasi atanmas\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle kural, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13, 20 ve 35. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r, iptali gerekir.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anayasa Mahkemesi, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 407 ve 471. maddelerinin iptaline karar verdi. H\u00fck\u00fcm, 9 ay sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":103886,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[565,170,580,12182,12785],"class_list":["post-103885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-anayasa","tag-hak","tag-karar","tag-mulkiyet","tag-vasi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=103885"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103885\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103887,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103885\/revisions\/103887"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/103886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=103885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=103885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=103885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}