{"id":10428,"date":"2022-07-19T14:36:06","date_gmt":"2022-07-19T14:36:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/?p=10428"},"modified":"2022-07-19T14:36:06","modified_gmt":"2022-07-19T14:36:06","slug":"iki-hakim-istanbul-sozlesmesi-kararina-serh-koydu-anayasaya-aykiri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/?p=10428","title":{"rendered":"\u0130ki hakim \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi karar\u0131na \u015ferh koydu: Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi, \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi&#8217;nin feshine ili\u015fkin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini 3&#8217;e kar\u015f\u0131 2 oyla reddetti. Karara \u015ferh koyan iki hakim &#8220;karar Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131&#8221; dedi<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi \u00fcyesi \u00fc\u00e7 hakim \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nden Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 karar\u0131yla \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuka uygun bularak iptal istemini reddetti. Fakat iki hakim Ahmet Sara\u00e7 ve \u0130brahim Topuz iptal talebini desteklediler ve karara \u015ferh d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcler.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u0130\u015eTE KAR\u015eI OY\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00dc\u00e7 hakim, \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuka uygun bulurken Sara\u00e7 ve Topuz\u2019un haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde ise \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTBMM taraf\u0131ndan Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 90. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda c\u0327\u0131kar\u0131lan uygun bulma kanununa bag\u0306l\u0131 olarak onaylanan milletleraras\u0131 andlas\u0327malar kanun hu\u0308kmu\u0308ndedir.<\/p>\n<p>An\u0131lan andlas\u0327malar\u0131n feshedilmesine ilis\u0327kin is\u0327lemlerin Cumhurbas\u0327kan\u0131n\u0131n yu\u0308ru\u0308tme yetkisinde olmay\u0131p, TBMM&#8217;nin yasama faaliyetine ilis\u0327kin olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, Anayasan\u0131n 104. maddesinin 17. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Cumhurbas\u0327kanl\u0131g\u0306\u0131 Kararnamesi ile du\u0308zenlenmesi mu\u0308mku\u0308n deg\u0306ildir.<\/p>\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, uyus\u0327mazl\u0131g\u0306\u0131n konusu, uluslararas\u0131 andlas\u0327malar\u0131 feshetme yetkisinin kanunla du\u0308zenlenip du\u0308zenlenemeyeceg\u0306i deg\u0306il, Cumhurbas\u0327kanl\u0131g\u0306\u0131 Kararnamesiyle du\u0308zenlenip du\u0308zenlenemeyeceg\u0306i oldug\u0306undan ve yetkinin kanunla verilmesi ile Cumhurbas\u0327kanl\u0131g\u0306\u0131 Kararnamesiyle verilmesi farkl\u0131 hususlar oldug\u0306undan; eski do\u0308nemde 31\/05\/1963 tarih ve 244 say\u0131l\u0131 Milletleraras\u0131 Andlas\u0327malar\u0131n Yap\u0131lmas\u0131, Yu\u0308ru\u0308rlu\u0308g\u0306u\u0308 ve Yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Andlas\u0327malar\u0131n Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 I\u0307c\u0327in Bakanlar Kuruluna Yetki Verilmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un yu\u0308ru\u0308rlu\u0308kte olmayan 3. maddesi ile benzer yetkilerin Bakanlar Kuruluna verilmis\u0327 olmas\u0131, bu yetkinin Cumhurbas\u0327kanl\u0131g\u0306\u0131 Kararnamesi ile verilmesine dayanak olarak kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n<p>So\u0308zles\u0327menin temel hak ve o\u0308zgu\u0308rlu\u0308klere ilis\u0327kin olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, ayn\u0131 konuda kanunlarla farkl\u0131 hu\u0308ku\u0308mler ic\u0327ermesi durumunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 90. maddesinin 5. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca so\u0308zles\u0327me hu\u0308ku\u0308mlerinin esas al\u0131nacag\u0306\u0131 tart\u0131s\u0327mas\u0131z olup; usulu\u0308ne go\u0308re yu\u0308ru\u0308rlu\u0308g\u0306e konularak kanun hu\u0308kmu\u0308 kazanan milletleraras\u0131 andlas\u0327malar\u0131n hukuk sistemine etkileri de go\u0308z o\u0308nu\u0308ne al\u0131nd\u0131g\u0306\u0131nda, bu andlas\u0327malar\u0131n hu\u0308ku\u0308mlerinin deg\u0306is\u0327tirilmesi, sona erdirilmesi, feshedilmesi gibi hususlar\u0131n yasama faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda oldug\u0306u ve Anayasan\u0131n 104. maddesinin 17. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Cumhurbas\u0327kanl\u0131g\u0306\u0131 Kararnamesi ile du\u0308zenlenemeyeceg\u0306i ac\u0327\u0131kt\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cCUMHURBA\u015eKANLI\u011eININ ARG\u00dcMANLARINI TEKRARLAMAKLA YET\u0130NM\u0130\u015eLER\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 kad\u0131n avukatlardan H\u00fclya G\u00fclbahar da karar gerek\u00e7esine dair \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi:<\/p>\n<p>\u201c37 sayfal\u0131k kararda hukukun \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7acak herhangi bir ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z fikre rastlayamad\u0131k. Maalesef Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi\u2019nin \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu, daval\u0131 taraf olan Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlamakla yetinmi\u015f.<\/p>\n<p>Ahmet Sara\u00e7, \u0130brahim Topuz son derece net bir kar\u015f\u0131 oy yaz\u0131s\u0131 yazarak \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f i\u015fleminin Anayasa\u2019ya ne kadar ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu net bir \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p>Heyetin ba\u015fkan dahil, \u00fc\u00e7 \u00fcyesinin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin anlam\u0131n\u0131, kad\u0131n ve \u00e7ocuklar i\u00e7in can g\u00fcvenliklerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 dahil \u00f6nemini kavrayamam\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar bize \u00fcz\u00fclerek s\u00f6yleyeyim ki kan\u0131tlam\u0131\u015f oldu.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cYARGI\u00c7LARIN KONUYA B\u0130RAZ OLSUN HAK\u0130M OLMALARI BEKLEN\u0130R\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019ne gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u00e7 hukukumuzda \u015fiddetle ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmler oldu\u011funu belirten karar b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, bu konudaki mevzuat\u0131 kavramaktan bu \u00fc\u00e7 \u00fcyenin ne kadar uzak oldu\u011funu ispat ediyor.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131da yarg\u0131\u00e7l\u0131k yapan ve \u00fclke tarihinde bu kadar kritik kararlar veren hakimlerin konuya biraz olsun hakim olmalar\u0131 beklenir. Kanuna eklenen e\u015fe veya bo\u015fan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olunan e\u015fe kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenmesini a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f neden sayan 7331 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunu iki kere anlatm\u0131\u015flar.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Eylem Plan\u0131n\u0131n \u2018\u0130\u2019 harfinin bile uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 c\u00fcmle alem bilirken kad\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u015fiddete kar\u015f\u0131 bu plana at\u0131fta bulunulmu\u015f. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin hukuk devleti olmaktan uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren tipik bir \u00f6rnek bu. 30 g\u00fcnl\u00fck temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u015fleyecek. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kad\u0131n hareketi olarak ba\u015fvurup sonuna kadar davam\u0131z\u0131n takip\u00e7isi olaca\u011f\u0131z. \u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi, \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi&#8217;nin feshine ili\u015fkin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini 3&#8217;e kar\u015f\u0131 2 oyla reddetti. Karara \u015ferh koyan &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10429,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[2632,296,53,580,2396],"class_list":["post-10428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-hakim","tag-hukuk","tag-kanun","tag-karar","tag-yetki"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10428"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10428\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10430,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10428\/revisions\/10430"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}