T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi Kad\u0131n Hukuk Komisyonu (T\u00dcBAKKOM), Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi\u2019nin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine ili\u015fkin 20 Mart 2021 tarihli Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini reddetmesini, hukuk devletine vurulan en a\u011f\u0131r darbelerden biri oldu\u011fu belirtti. TBB, \u201cBa\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z yarg\u0131 yoksa, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z avukatlar var. Ankara\u2019da yarg\u0131\u00e7lar yoksa T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin 81 ilinde \u00fclkenin ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131 savunacak avukatlar var\u201d s\u00f6zleriyle tepkisini dile getirdi.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n
T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi Kad\u0131n Hukuk Komisyonu (T\u00dcBAKKOM), Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131yla iptal edilen \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klamada, \u201cT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nden \u00e7ekilmesine ili\u015fkin 19.03.2021 tarih ve 3718 say\u0131l\u0131 Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan iptal davalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesinin oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu ret karar\u0131 siyasalla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yarg\u0131n\u0131n demokratik hukuk devletine vurmu\u015f oldu\u011fu en a\u011f\u0131r darbelerden biridir. Zira art\u0131k ortada bir g\u00fc\u00e7ler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejimi de\u011fil, \u00e7o\u011fulculu\u011fu d\u0131\u015flayan, tekle\u015ftirici, otokratik g\u00fc\u00e7ler birli\u011fi rejimi h\u00fck\u00fcm s\u00fcrmekte, bu karar da bunu if\u015fa etmektedir\u201d ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n
\u201cANAYASA AYAKLAR ALTINA ALINDI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n A\u00e7\u0131klamada milli iradenin tek ki\u015finin keyfiyetine b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yarataca\u011f\u0131 sak\u0131ncalar dikkat \u00e7ekilerek \u015fu ifadeler kullan\u0131ld\u0131; \u201cS\u00f6z konusu karar, T\u00fcrkiye’de kad\u0131n m\u00fccadelesinin en \u00f6nemli dayanaklar\u0131ndan biri ve kad\u0131nlar\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015fiddete kar\u015f\u0131 koruma kalkan\u0131 olan \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesini y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131rken ayn\u0131 zamanda Anayasay\u0131 da ayaklar alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Lakin bu karar Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 90. ve 104. maddeleri yok say\u0131larak, yasama makam\u0131 olan TBMM taraf\u0131ndan onaylanarak uygun bulunmu\u015f kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde bir temel insan haklar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin karar\u0131 ile \u00e7ekilmenin \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 demek olacakt\u0131r ki; bu, milletin iradesinin gasp\u0131 ile milli iradenin tek ki\u015finin keyfiyetine teslim edilmesi demektir.<\/p>\n Y\u00fcr\u00fctmeye tan\u0131nan bu yarg\u0131 denetiminden yoksun, s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z takdir yetkisi, ba\u015fta kad\u0131nlar olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm yurtta\u015flar\u0131n ki\u015fi hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerini, hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik a\u011f\u0131r bir hak ihlalidir.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cMA\u011eDUR KADINLARI SAVUNACAK AVUKATLAR VAR\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cT\u00dcBAKKOM olarak her ko\u015fulda demokratik hukuk devletini savunmaya devam edece\u011fimizi, \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden ve kad\u0131n haklar\u0131 m\u00fccadelemizden vazge\u00e7meyece\u011fimizi kamuoyuyla bir kez daha payla\u015f\u0131yor ve bir kez daha hat\u0131rlat\u0131yoruz, \u2018Ankara’da yarg\u0131\u00e7lar yoksa T\u00fcrkiye’nin 81 ilinde \u00fclkenin ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131 savunacak Avukatlar var.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T\u00fcrkiye Barolar Birli\u011fi Kad\u0131n Hukuk Komisyonu (T\u00dcBAKKOM), Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi\u2019nin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine ili\u015fkin 20 Mart 2021 tarihli …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10904,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[296,209,995,15,460],"class_list":["post-10903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-hukuk","tag-kadin","tag-karari","tag-turkiye","tag-yargi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10903"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10903\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10905,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10903\/revisions\/10905"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10904"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}