Diyarbak\u0131r Ergani’de ablas\u0131 Yonca Bayburan’\u0131 (24) 9 y\u0131l \u00f6nce kafas\u0131ndan tek kur\u015funla \u00f6ld\u00fcren ve 8 y\u0131l boyunca gizlenip ge\u00e7en y\u0131l \u0130stanbul’da yakalanan F.T., A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nce \u201cT\u00f6re saikiyle karde\u015fi kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek\u201d su\u00e7undan \u00f6nce m\u00fcebbet, ard\u0131ndan da cinayetin i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihte 18 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 21 y\u0131l hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130ND\u0130R\u0130M UYGULAMADI<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkeme abla katilinin 8 y\u0131l boyunca gizlenip teslim olmadan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hakk\u0131nda iyi hal indirimi de uygulamad\u0131. B\u00f6lge \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi san\u0131\u011fa verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 hukuka uygun buldu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurusunu esastan reddetti.<\/p>\n \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi, karar\u0131nda G\u00fcneydo\u011fu’nun kanayan yaras\u0131 haline gelen t\u00f6re cinayetlerine de \u00f6nemli vurgu yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n KARAR DO\u011eRU AMA \u2018T\u00d6RE\u2019 DEN\u0130LEMEZ<\/strong><\/p>\n Kararda bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fini, vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n tam, somut delillerle h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011funu, ancak cinayetin t\u00f6re cinayeti olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi. Mahkeme, t\u00f6reden bahsedilebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle ma\u011fdurun toplumda genel olarak benimsenmi\u015f ya\u015fam bi\u00e7imine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine vurgu yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n Bu ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcmle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin, \u2018yine o toplumda ya\u015fayanlar taraf\u0131ndan beklenen bir tepki oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi\u2019 gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekildi.<\/p>\n Yine \u00f6ld\u00fcrmenin fail taraf\u0131ndan toplumun \u00f6ld\u00fcrme beklentisinin y\u00f6nlendirmesiyle s\u0131rf ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00f6revinin \u00fcstlenilerek i\u015flenmesi halinde t\u00f6re cinayeti olabilece\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n T\u00f6re kavram\u0131yla s\u0131k s\u0131k kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u201cNamus\u201d kavram\u0131n\u0131n ise bir toplum i\u00e7inde ahlak kurallar\u0131na ve toplumsal de\u011ferlere ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k, iffet, d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten mahkeme, t\u00f6re ile namus cinayetinin ayn\u0131 kavramlar olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti.<\/p>\n T\u00d6RE OLMAZ, TASARLAMA YOK D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONAMA<\/strong><\/p>\n E\u015finden g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fiddete dayanamay\u0131p e\u015finden ayr\u0131l\u0131p annesinin evine d\u00f6nen Yonca Bayburan’\u0131n bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda e\u015fiyle resmi olarak hen\u00fcz bo\u015fanmad\u0131klar\u0131, ispat edilememekle birlikte karde\u015fi F.T’nin iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ablas\u0131n\u0131n mahallede ba\u015fka erkeklerle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve dedikodu \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 \u00fczerine ablas\u0131n\u0131 evdeyken kafas\u0131ndan tek kur\u015funla vurup \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bildirildi.<\/p>\n San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendi s\u00fcbjektif de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ablas\u0131n\u0131 toplumsal bir istek olmaks\u0131z\u0131n kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeden ceza verilmesi gerekirken, t\u00f6re saikiyle i\u015flendi\u011fi bi\u00e7iminde karar verilmesiyle su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dikkat \u00e7ekildi.<\/p>\n \u0130stinaf, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ablas\u0131n\u0131 tasarlayarak \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair de dosyada delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tasarlamadan s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in failin cinayet i\u015flemek i\u00e7in ko\u015fulsuz karar verip, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcp planlama yapmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, ancak somut olayda evde \u00e7\u0131kan ani tart\u0131\u015fma \u00fczerine ablas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in karar d\u00fczeltilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n ABLASINA YAFTALAMA YAPARAK SU\u00c7TAN KURTULMAK \u0130ST\u0130YOR<\/strong><\/p>\n Yasak ili\u015fki dedikodular\u0131na ra\u011fmen Yonca’dan al\u0131nan genetik \u00f6rnekler \u00fczerinde ATK’da yap\u0131lan biyolojik incelemede, sperm h\u00fccresi ve meni \u00f6rneklerine rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da raporlarla sabit oldu\u011funa vurgu yapan mahkeme, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik indirim uygulanmay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 da yasaya uygun buldu.<\/p>\n San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ablas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesini yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmaya y\u00f6nelik yaftalamada bulunarak su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in iddialar\u0131na itibar edilmeyece\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n San\u0131\u011f\u0131n cinayet sonras\u0131 tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak itiraz \u00fczerine serbest kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak 8 y\u0131l boyunca firari gezip yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in iyi halli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan cezas\u0131nda 62. Maddeyi d\u00fczenleyen iyi hal indirimi yap\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 da hukuka uygun buldu.<\/p>\n Dosya nihai karar verilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Diyarbak\u0131r\u2019da 8 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ablas\u0131n\u0131, “Erkeklerle dola\u015f\u0131yor\u201d dedikodusu y\u00fcz\u00fcnden \u00f6ld\u00fcren F.T.,\u00a0 “T\u00f6re saikiyle kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek” su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla 21 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Karar\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u0130stinaf mahkemesi cezay\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun bulundu. Ancak t\u00f6re kriterlerini s\u0131ralayan mahkeme “B\u00f6yle t\u00f6re olmaz” dedi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":111193,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[13264,171,580,505,7456],"class_list":["post-111192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-ablasi","tag-ceza","tag-karar","tag-mahkeme","tag-tore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=111192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111194,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111192\/revisions\/111194"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/111193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=111192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=111192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=111192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}