Diyarbak\u0131r’da 89 ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7lanan Diyar Galeria sitesiyle ilgili Diyarbak\u0131r Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130zmir 9 Eyl\u00fcl \u00dcniversitesi\u2019nde g\u00f6revli 4’\u00fc Profes\u00f6r 6 ki\u015filik bilirki\u015fi heyetinin haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 66 sayfal\u0131k raporun ard\u0131ndan, Galeria sitesinin m\u00fcteahhitlerinden tutuklu san\u0131klar Mehmet \u015eirin Yi\u011fit, karde\u015fi \u015eeyhmus Yi\u011fit, Sedat Eser, \u0130n\u015faat M\u00fchendisi Tevfik Demir ile hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulunan m\u00fcteahhit firma yetkilileri Murat Eser, \u0130brahim Halil Yi\u011fit, Hac\u0131 Metin Yi\u011fit hakk\u0131nda A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n
DOSYA ORTADA KALDI<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianame 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderildi. Ancak mahkeme 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal kabul s\u00fcresi dolduktan sonra iddianameyi eksik soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcp 10 maddelik gerek\u00e7e ile iade etti.<\/p>\n \u201cB\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130 RAPORLARI ARASINDA BAR\u0130Z \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eK\u0130LER VAR\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkeme, F\u0131rat \u00dcniversitesi\u2019nin ana raporu, ek raporu ve \u0130zmir 9 Eyl\u00fcl \u00dcniversitesinden al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7ok ciddi, bariz ve fahi\u015f \u00e7eli\u015fkiler bulundu\u011funu, asli kusurlu ve tali kusurlu ki\u015filerin belirlenmedi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi.<\/p>\n Teknik inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirmelerin yetersiz oldu\u011funa vurgu yapan mahkeme iade karar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca haklar\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulunan 4 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na giri\u015f veya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmedi\u011fini, san\u0131klar\u0131n Diyarbak\u0131r’a kom\u015fu olan Irak veya Suriye’ye de ka\u00e7m\u0131\u015f olabilecekleri ihtimaline kar\u015f\u0131 polis ve jandarma arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmamas\u0131n\u0131n da eksik soru\u015fturma oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n Ma\u011fdurlara \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131 ve davaya kat\u0131lma talepleri olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, enkazda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden Sedef Fato\u015f \u00d6zdemir’in \u00f6l\u00fc muayene ve otopsi raporunun dosya i\u00e7inde yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden mahkeme, haklar\u0131nda ay\u0131rma karar\u0131 verilen kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin soru\u015fturma izni i\u00e7in dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131lmas\u0131yla ilgili sonucun da beklenmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n Mahkeme \u00f6lenlerin yasal miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n da dosyaya eklenmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle iddianamenin iadesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n BA\u015eSAVCILIK \u0130T\u0130RAZ ETT\u0130 \u0130ADE KARARI KALDIRILDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k iade karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u00fcst mahkemeye itirazda bulundu. \u00d6ncelikle 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 sonras\u0131 iade karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasa gere\u011fi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izen ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde iddianamenin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, di\u011fer iade gerek\u00e7elerinin ise soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecini uzataca\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n 7 aydan beri tutuklu olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iade gerek\u00e7elerinin yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan da giderilebilece\u011fine vurgu yap\u0131larak iade karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edildi.<\/p>\n \u0130tiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u00fcst mahkeme, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 buldu ve 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal s\u00fcresinin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra usul ve yasa gere\u011fi iddianamenin iade edilemeyece\u011fine i\u015faret etti. Mahkeme, dosyada kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7acak yeterli derecede \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015ftu\u011fu ve delillerin incelenmesiyle itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verip iade karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n \u0130DD\u0130ANAMEY\u0130 KABUL ETT\u0130 AMA\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n Bu karar \u00fczerine iddianameyi kabul edip ara kararlar i\u00e7eren tensip zapt\u0131 haz\u0131rlayarak duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc vermesi gereken mahkeme bu kez dosyay\u0131 ayn\u0131 iade gerek\u00e7eleriyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebiyle Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6nderdi. Bakanl\u0131ktan gelecek cevap \u00fczerine iddianamenin kabul edilip edilmeyece\u011fine karar verilecek.<\/p>\n TAD\u0130LAT DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130LE TAVAN Y\u00dcKSEKL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ARTIRILMI\u015e<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, Tadilat ruhsat\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra ticari alan kat y\u00fcksekli\u011fi 6,5 metre iken 9,5 metreye \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak imar plan\u0131 tadilat\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi. Projeye ait statik betonarme ve tesisat projesine de rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131. \u0130ddianamede, projenin onaylanmas\u0131ndan sonra yap\u0131 kullan\u0131m izin belgesine rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n 1997’de temeli at\u0131lan Diyar Galeria Sitesinin batakl\u0131k zemine, kalitesiz malzeme ile birlikte imara ayk\u0131r\u0131 in\u015fa edildi\u011fi belirtildi. Bina alt\u0131ndaki d\u00fckk\u00e2n ve bodrumlarda kolon kesildi\u011fi, duvarlar\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kap\u0131 a\u00e7ma, katlar aras\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131y\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in merdiven a\u00e7ma gibi binan\u0131 statik durumuna etki edecek derecede tadilat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm y\u00f6nleriyle ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n \u201c\u0130MALAT HATASI VAR, SORUMLUDURLAR\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n F\u0131rat \u00dcniversitesi ile 9 Eyl\u00fcl \u00dcniversitesinden 3 farkl\u0131 bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Kolon kesildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu raporda yer ald\u0131. \u0130ddianamede, binan\u0131n yap\u0131 kullan\u0131m izin belgesi d\u00fczenlenmeden isk\u00e2na a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirildi.<\/p>\n 7 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n binan\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olan imalat hatalar\u0131ndan sorumlu olduklar\u0131, gerek proje, gerekse yap\u0131m a\u015famas\u0131nda ve i\u015f bitimi a\u015famas\u0131nda \u00fczerlerine d\u00fc\u015fen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri yerine getirmedikleri bildirildi.<\/p>\n Mesleki bilgi, birikim ve tecr\u00fcbe dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilen bu netice bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ettikleri ve 89 ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in bilin\u00e7li taksir d\u00fczeyinde sorumlu olduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in 15’er y\u0131l hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 istendi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Diyarbak\u0131r\u2019da 6 \u015eubat’ta 89 ki\u015fiye mezar olan Diyar Galeria sitesiyle ilgili dava dosyas\u0131 ortada kald\u0131. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k iddianameyi haz\u0131rlay\u0131p mahkemeye g\u00f6nderdi. Mahkeme ise \u201cEksik soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f\u201d diyerek iade etti. Savc\u0131l\u0131k \u00fcst mahkemeye itirazda bulundu. Mahkeme, \u201cEksiklik yok\u201d diyerek itiraz\u0131 hakl\u0131 buldu ve iade karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi bu karar \u00fczerine iddianamenin kabul\u00fcne karar verip duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc vermesi gerekirken bu kez dosyay\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebiyle Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ne g\u00f6nderdi….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":118023,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[1434,673,1590,580,505],"class_list":["post-118022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-dosya","tag-iade","tag-iddianame","tag-karar","tag-mahkeme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=118022"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118022\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":118024,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118022\/revisions\/118024"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/118023"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=118022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=118022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=118022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}