Avukatlar, tutuklu milletvekili Can Atalay’\u0131n tahliyesi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu \u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n
T\u0130P S\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Sera Kad\u0131gil ve CHP \u015eanl\u0131urfa Milletvekili Mahmut Tanal da \u201cCan Atalay\u2019\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131\/meslekta\u015flar\u0131\u201d imzas\u0131yla d\u00fczenlenen a\u00e7\u0131klamaya kat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u201cDER\u0130N B\u0130R TAHR\u0130BAT YARATTI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cCan Atalay Meclis\u2019e\u201d yaz\u0131l\u0131 pankart a\u00e7an avukatlar \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 yapt\u0131:<\/p>\n * \u201cOsman Kavala 1 Kas\u0131m 2017 tarihinden bu yana 2131 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr, Avukat Can Atalay ve gezi tutsaklar\u0131 di\u011fer be\u015f san\u0131k ise 25 Nisan 2022 tarihinden bu yana 494 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr ceza hukukunun en temel ilkelerinin \u00e7i\u011fnendi\u011fi, amac\u0131n\u0131n maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmak yerine topluma g\u00f6z da\u011f\u0131 vermek olan bir \u2018yarg\u0131lama\u2019 neticesinde \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f durumdalar. Gezi Davas\u0131 ile ama\u00e7lanan\u0131n \u2018makbul vatanda\u015fl\u0131k\u2019 s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n muktedir taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7izilerek toplumu dizayn etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak oldu\u011funun fark\u0131nday\u0131z ve davadaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u00fclkemiz demokrasisi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan derin bir tahribat yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bilincindeyiz.<\/p>\n \u201cANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130\u2019NE AYKIRI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n * Avukat Can Atalay, 14 May\u0131s 2023 tarihinde T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Partisi\u2019nden Hatay milletvekili se\u00e7ilerek mazbatas\u0131n\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve milletvekili s\u0131fat\u0131na ra\u011fmen 110 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr tutukluluk hali devam etmedir. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, 13.07.2023 tarihinde 75.643 yurtta\u015f\u0131n oyuyla milletvekili se\u00e7ilen Can Atalay hakk\u0131ndaki durma ve tahliye talebini Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n \u201c\u0130NSAN HAKLARINDAN YOKSUN BIRAKILIYOR\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n * Avukat Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n tutukluluk hali Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n cumhuriyetin nitelikleri ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 2. Maddesi, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 19. Maddesi, yasama dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 83. Maddesi, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6rev ve yetkileri ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 148. Maddesi, Anayasa Mahkemesinin kararlar\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 153. Maddesi ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n pek \u00e7ok maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etmektedir. Bir di\u011fer ifadeyle \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Komisyonu\u2019na mensup milletvekili Can Atalay insan haklar\u0131n yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n \u201cYARGITAY EL\u0130YLE \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n * Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi, tahliye talebinin reddi karar\u0131nda, kendisini normlar hiyerar\u015fisinin en \u00fcst\u00fcnde olan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnde addederek Anayasa\u2019y\u0131 yorumlama yetkisini kendisinde g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ancak \u00f6nemle vurgulamak gerekir ki Anayasa Mahkemesi bir Anayasa organ\u0131d\u0131r ve Anayasa\u2019y\u0131 nihai yorumlama yetkisi Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nde oldu\u011fu gibi di\u011fer organlar\u0131n Anayasal s\u0131n\u0131rlara uygunlu\u011funu tespit g\u00f6revi de Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ndedir. Avukat Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n tahliye talebinin reddi karar\u0131 ile Anayasal ilkeler Yarg\u0131tay eliyle ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n \u201cN\u0130HA\u0130 YORUM YETK\u0130S\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130\u2019NE A\u0130T\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n * Anayasa Mahkemesi Ekim 2022 tarihli Leyla G\u00fcven ba\u015fvurusunda \u015fu tespiti yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r: Bu nedenle de derece mahkemeleri yarg\u0131lamaya konu edilen su\u00e7un Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 14. maddesi kapsam\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kanun koyucu taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan bir kanun metnini yorumlay\u0131p uygulayarak de\u011fil do\u011frudan Anayasa h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yorumlay\u0131p uygulayarak belirlemektedir. O halde derece mahkemelerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 14. maddesine ili\u015fkin olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yorumun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fi ve belirlili\u011fi ifade eden kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcne uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Norm denetiminde oldu\u011fu gibi bireysel ba\u015fvuru yolunda da Anayasa maddelerinin nihai yorum yetkisi Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne aittir.<\/p>\n * Leyla G\u00fcven ba\u015fvurusunda da belirtilen ve askeri rejimin g\u00fcvenlik konseyi eklemesi olan Anayasa Madde 14\/2, temel hak ver h\u00fcrriyetlere m\u00fcdahalenin ancak kanun ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilece\u011fini ifade eden AY Madde 13\u2019e ko\u015fut olarak son c\u00fcmlesinde istisnan\u0131n ancak Kanun ile d\u00fczenlenece\u011fini ifade etse de b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Anayasa Madde 14\/2 uygulamas\u0131z kalm\u0131\u015f durumdad\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin tutuklu milletvekilleri konulu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda da su\u00e7 ve cezalar\u0131n kanunili\u011fi ilkesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda bu tespitin alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n AYM\u2019YE \u00c7A\u011eRI<\/strong><\/p>\n * Avukat Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n meslekta\u015flar\u0131 ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131m\u0131z; hukuk devletinin en \u00f6nemli ilkelerinden biri olan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirlik ilkesi ve tutuklu milletvekilleri hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce verdi\u011fi kararlar do\u011frultusunda Anayasa Madde 14 uyar\u0131nca i\u00e7tihad\u0131 devam ettirmesi ve ivedi \u015fekilde ihlal karar\u0131 vermesidir. Anayasa Madde 14\u2019de yer alan bo\u015flu\u011fun san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine yorumlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 ilkesi ise en temel ceza hukuku ilkelerinden biridir.<\/p>\n * Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam etti\u011fi her g\u00fcn \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali oldu\u011fu kadar kendisine oy veren 75.643 yurtta\u015f\u0131n siyasi kat\u0131l\u0131m haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. 6<\/p>\n * \u015eubat 2023 tarihli Mara\u015f merkezli deprem felaketinden bu yana Hatay halk\u0131 su, g\u0131da, sa\u011fl\u0131k ve bar\u0131nma gibi en temel ya\u015famsal ihtiya\u00e7lara eri\u015fimde ciddi sorunlar ya\u015famakta, asbest tehlikesi gibi nesilden nesile kal\u0131c\u0131 hasar b\u0131rakacak \u00e7evre sorunlar\u0131yla m\u00fccadele etmekte ve vekillerinin 110 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr devam eden tutukluluk hali sebebiyle bu sorunlar\u0131 dile getirememekte, halk\u0131n ifade h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlanmaktad\u0131r. Bir di\u011fer ifadeyle T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Partisi Hatay Milletvekili Avukat Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n hukuksuz \u015fekilde tutuklu oldu\u011fu her g\u00fcn Hatay halk\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan telafisi imkans\u0131z zararlar\u0131 meydana getirmektedir.<\/p>\n * T\u00fcm bu ya\u015fananlar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nden bir an \u00f6nce hukukun ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n gere\u011fini yerine getirmesini, benzer konulu ba\u015fvurularla i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131 yeknesak hale getirmesini ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n siyasal iktidar\u0131n arac\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na derhal son verilmesini talep ediyoruz.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Avukatlar; tutuklu bulunan T\u0130P Hatay Milletvekili Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Barosu \u00f6n\u00fcnde \u2018Hatay vekilini istiyor\u2019 slogan\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":122578,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[565,7593,170,720,3074],"class_list":["post-122577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-anayasa","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-hak","tag-tutuklu","tag-yorum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=122577"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":122579,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122577\/revisions\/122579"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/122578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=122577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=122577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=122577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}