Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi, i\u015fyeri hekimlerini yak\u0131ndan ilgilendiren emsal nitelikte bir karara imza att\u0131. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme; i\u015fyeri hekiminin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin; hizmetin ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden hizmet al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile feshedilmesinin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayal\u0131 bir fesih olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. <\/b><\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fyeri hekimi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan K.Y\u2019nin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, \u2018i\u015fyerindeki is sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hizmetlerinin ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesi’ sebebiyle feshedildi. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin yolunu tutan Dr. Y., feshin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme; davac\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k personelinin yeterlili\u011fe sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir nitelikte delil sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine ve davac\u0131n\u0131n ise iadesine karar verdi. Daval\u0131 \u015firket, karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u0130\u015e YER\u0130N\u0130N FARKLI YER\u0130NDE \u0130ST\u0130HDAMI M\u00dcMK\u00dcN DE\u011e\u0130L\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revinin ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden alma y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu karar do\u011frultusunda da i\u015finin niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi i\u015f yerinin farkl\u0131 bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde istihdam\u0131 da fiilen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan davac\u0131n\u0131n, i\u015f akdinin ge\u00e7erli nedenle feshedildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti. Daval\u0131 bu kez karar\u0131 temyiz edince devreye Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi girdi.<\/p>\n Emsal nitelikte bir karara imza atan Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme; i\u015fyeri hekiminin feshini yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 buldu. Kararda \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201cBa\u015fvuru konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda, \u0130\u015fverence kanundaki a\u00e7\u0131k d\u00fczenlemenin aksine bir karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusudur. \u0130\u015fverenin i\u015fyerinde ayn\u0131 hizmeti s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmekte olan is\u00e7ileri mevcut iken \u2018ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden hizmet alaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle mevcut i\u015fyeri hekimi, hem\u015fire ve sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlilerinin is s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetmesi\u2019 kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n Kanunda, i\u015fverene i\u015fyerinde i\u015fyeri hekimi ile sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlileri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etmek yahut ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden hizmet almak konusunda bir se\u00e7im hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olup, aksine, i\u015fyerinde is g\u00fcvenli\u011fi uzman\u0131, i\u015fyeri hekimi veya di\u011fer sa\u011fl\u0131k personelinin bulunmamas\u0131 halinde ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden hizmet al\u0131nmas\u0131 imkan\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. B\u00f6ylece i\u015fverenin i\u015fletmesel karar alma serbestisi bir anlamda kanun ile s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Bu nedenle kanunun a\u00e7\u0131k h\u00fckm\u00fc hilaf\u0131na al\u0131nan bir karar sonucunda, ortak sa\u011fl\u0131k ve g\u00fcvenlik biriminden hizmet al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan i\u015fyeri hekimi, hem\u015fire ve di\u011fer sa\u011fl\u0131k personelinin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi, ge\u00e7erli nedene dayal\u0131 bir fesih de\u011fildir. \u201d (\u0130HA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi, i\u015fyeri hekimlerini yak\u0131ndan ilgilendiren emsal nitelikte bir karara imza att\u0131. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme; i\u015fyeri hekiminin i\u015f …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":24441,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[1368,83,4553,580,1116],"class_list":["post-24440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-hizmet","tag-is","tag-isyeri","tag-karar","tag-ortak"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=24440"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24442,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24440\/revisions\/24442"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/24441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=24440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=24440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=24440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}