T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi (TTB), Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi’nin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine ili\u015fkin Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini reddetmesini temyize ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/b><\/p>\n
\u2018\u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019 ad\u0131yla an\u0131lan \u2018Kad\u0131nlara Y\u00f6nelik \u015eiddet ve Aile \u0130\u00e7i \u015eiddetin \u00d6nlenmesi ve Bunlarla M\u00fccadeleye \u0130li\u015fkin Avrupa Konseyi S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nden 20 Mart 2021 g\u00fcn\u00fc Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesiyle \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
200\u2019DEN FAZLA DAVA A\u00c7ILDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Karara kar\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin, barolar\u0131n, emek-meslek \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin, demokratik kitle \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin, siyasi partilerin ve bireylerin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 200’den fazla davaya ili\u015fkin duru\u015fmalar 2022 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n nisan, may\u0131s ve haziran aylar\u0131nda gruplar halinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi’nin (TTB) de aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu \u00f6rg\u00fctler s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden \u00e7ekilme karar\u0131n\u0131n toplumsal, siyasal ve hukuksal anlam\u0131 \u00fczerine konu\u015fmalar yaparken; Dan\u0131\u015ftay savc\u0131s\u0131 da \u2018s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden \u00e7ekilme karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali\u2019 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f sunmu\u015ftu. Karar\u0131n\u0131 19 Temmuz 2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klayan Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi ise \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin feshine ili\u015fkin Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini ikiye kar\u015f\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 oyla reddetmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n TTB, Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi’nin karar\u0131 ile ilgili 30 A\u011fustos 2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu’na temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu.<\/p>\n \u201cHUKUKA AYKIRIDIR\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa’n\u0131n 90. ve 104. maddelerine at\u0131fla, bir insan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri metni olan \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin idarenin yetki alan\u0131nda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi karar\u0131nda dava konusu i\u015flemin hukuka uygunlu\u011funun salt yetki tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ile y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ifade edildi\u011fi ba\u015fvuruda\u00a0\u201cDolay\u0131s\u0131yla kararda \u2018yerindelik denetimi yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131’ belirtilirken Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 yetki kullan\u0131m\u0131 ise anayasal k\u0131st\u0131n yorum yoluyla geni\u015fletilmesi ile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava konusu i\u015flem, sebep, konu ve ama\u00e7 y\u00f6nlerinden hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n unsurlara dair gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermeyen karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekir\u201d\u00a0denildi.<\/p>\n Toplumsal cinsiyet ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayal\u0131 hak ihlallerinin \u00f6nlenmesinin salt mevzuat ile de\u011fil, mevzuat\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen politik tercihlerle de ili\u015fkili oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izilen ba\u015fvuruda; kad\u0131n haklar\u0131 m\u00fccadelesinin de i\u00e7inde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 insan haklar\u0131 m\u00fccadelesinin de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131na g\u00f6re \u015fekillendirilemeyece\u011fi de dile getirildi:<\/p>\n * \u201cSosyal, ekonomik ve siyasal ili\u015fkilerin d\u00fczenlenmesini belirleyen ilkeleri ve kamu alan\u0131nda ki\u015filerin g\u00f6rece\u011fi muameleyle ilgili normlar\u0131 -yani hukuku- her tarihsel anda mevcut ko\u015fullara insan haklar\u0131 bilgisinin \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda bakarak t\u00fcretmektir. Ve de\u011ferler, de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131na feda edilemezler.<\/p>\n * B\u00f6yle bir anlay\u0131\u015fla olu\u015fturulan hukuk sisteminin ise adalet ortaya koymas\u0131 beklenemez. Bu sebeple de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerinden al\u0131nan bu karar\u0131n adalet getirmesi beklenemez. De\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerinden al\u0131nan bu karar\u0131n toplum yarar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetmesi de beklenemez.\u201d<\/p>\n Y\u00dcR\u00dcTMEY\u0130 DURDURMA TALEP ED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine ili\u015fkin Dan\u0131\u015ftay’da a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda tam avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesinin hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali anlam\u0131na geldi\u011finden de s\u00f6z edilen ba\u015fvuruda \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi:<\/p>\n * \u201cDavam\u0131z parasal konular ve s\u0131n\u0131rlarla de\u011fil, \u015fiddetsiz bir hayat hakk\u0131 ile ilgili bir dava oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in usul ekonomisi prosed\u00fcrleri ve yarg\u0131 \u00fczerindeki i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc gibi istisnai hallere ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7elerle duru\u015fmas\u0131z g\u00f6r\u00fclecek davalardan de\u011fildir. Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ilkesinin bir gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n * Kamunun adli mekanizman\u0131n i\u015fleyi\u015fine ve denetimine kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131lama faaliyetinin saydaml\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak ve yarg\u0131lamada keyfili\u011fi \u00f6nlemek gibi etkileri nedeniyle hukuk devletinin en \u00f6nemli gereklerinden biridir. Bu nedenle duru\u015fma talebimizin kabul\u00fc adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n gereklerindendir.\u201d<\/p>\n Ba\u015fvurunun sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde; temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131larak dava konusu i\u015flemin y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131, ilgili Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne itiraz yolu ile iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 ve karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 talep edildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T\u00fcrk Tabipleri Birli\u011fi (TTB), Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesi’nin \u0130stanbul S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin feshine ili\u015fkin Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptal istemini …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35536,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[3033,775,170,77,460],"class_list":["post-35535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-danistay","tag-dava","tag-hak","tag-soz","tag-yargi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35535"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35537,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35535\/revisions\/35537"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/35536"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}