\u0130zmir’in Seferihisar il\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131nda meydana gelen 6.9 b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki depremde 36 ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi\u011fi, 17 ki\u015finin de yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 R\u0131za Bey Apartman\u0131 davas\u0131nda o d\u00f6nemki kamu g\u00f6revlileri Gamze E. (51) ve Mehmet Ali U’nun (68) ‘g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma’ su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131.<\/b><\/p>\n
Ege Denizi\u2019nde Seferihisar a\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131nda, 30 Ekim 2020\u2019de meydana gelen, 117 ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, 6.9 b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki depremde Bayrakl\u0131 il\u00e7esindeki 8 katl\u0131 R\u0131za Bey Apartman\u0131\u2019nda 36 ki\u015fi ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi, 17 ki\u015fi de yaraland\u0131. Depremin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 13 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131na \u0130zmir 5\u2019inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde devam edilirken, 2 kamu g\u00f6revlisi Gamze E. ve Mehmet Ali U. hakk\u0131nda ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma da tamamlan\u0131p, iddianame haz\u0131rland\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130ddianamede, bilirki\u015fi raporunda yap\u0131n\u0131n 1975 y\u0131l\u0131 deprem y\u00f6netmeli\u011fine tabi oldu\u011fu, projedeki beton dayan\u0131m s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, nerv\u00fcrl\u00fc donat\u0131lar\u0131n mekanik \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Yap\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131c\u0131 sistem elemanlar\u0131na, epoksi enjeksiyon ile projesiz, izinsiz ve kontrols\u00fcz \u015fekilde tamirat yapan ve yapt\u0131ranlarla s\u00f6z konusu tadilat\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonradan kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu konuda idari i\u015flem tesis etmeyen ilgili idari mercilerin de sorumlu olduklar\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
2 YILA KADAR HAP\u0130SLER\u0130 \u0130STEND\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n 2005 y\u0131l\u0131nda meydana gelen depremden sonra yap\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131c\u0131 sistem elemanlar\u0131na epoksi enjeksiyon ile projesiz, izinsiz ve kontrols\u00fcz tamirat i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesine ra\u011fmen binan\u0131n 3\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc grup risk kategorisinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131ld\u0131. 2007 deprem y\u00f6netmeli\u011fine g\u00f6re performans analizi yap\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re g\u00fc\u00e7lendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tavsiyede bulunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu konuda idari i\u015flem tesis etmeyen ve belgede o d\u00f6nem Bayrakl\u0131 Belediyesi Fen \u0130\u015fleri M\u00fcd\u00fcr Vekili s\u0131fat\u0131yla imzas\u0131 bulunan Gamze E.\u2019nin sorumlu oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi.<\/p>\n \u0130n\u015faat M\u00fchendisi Tamer Paker taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan statik hesap raporu ve betonarme projesi ile yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131n\u0131 27 Nisan 1993 tarihinde onaylayan o d\u00f6nemki Bornova Belediyesi \u0130mar M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Mimar Mehmet U.\u2019nun da sorumlu oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi. \u0130ddianamede binan\u0131n statik ve betonarme projesine onay veren \u0130n\u015faat M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131 \u0130zmir \u015eubesi\u2019nde g\u00f6revlilerin a\u00e7\u0131k kimlik tespitlerinin yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Toplanan deliller ve al\u0131nan ifadeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda savc\u0131, Gamze E. ve Mehmet Ali U. i\u00e7in \u2018g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma\u2019 su\u00e7undan 2\u2019\u015fer y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n B\u0130RLE\u015eT\u0130RME TALEB\u0130 UYGUN G\u00d6R\u00dcLMEM\u0130\u015e<\/strong><\/p>\n Tutuksuz san\u0131klar\u0131n bug\u00fcn, \u0130zmir 13\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131na ba\u015fland\u0131. Duru\u015fmaya tutuksuz san\u0131k Gamze E.\u2019nin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra taraf avukatlar\u0131 kat\u0131ld\u0131. Mehmet Ali U. ise duru\u015fmaya gelmedi. Duru\u015fmada ilk olarak \u015fikayet\u00e7ilerin avukatlar\u0131 s\u00f6z ald\u0131.<\/p>\n Avukatlar, m\u00fcvekkillerine duru\u015fma tarihi g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fini, bu durumun anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu savundu. Avukatlar ayr\u0131ca davan\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fini belirtip, hakimden g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vermesi talebinde bulundu. Avukatlar\u0131n taleplerinin ard\u0131ndan Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 ara m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 sundu. \u0130ddia makam\u0131, bu dosya ile 5\u2019inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde devam eden R\u0131za Bey Apartman\u0131 dosyas\u0131n\u0131n fiilen ve hukuki olarak birbirleriyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funun alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi.<\/p>\n \u0130ki dosyan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce birle\u015ftirilmesi talebinin kabul edilmedi\u011fini belirten iddia makam\u0131, birle\u015ftirme uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle dosyan\u0131n \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmesine ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde m\u00fctalaa sundu. M\u00fctalaan\u0131n okunmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan hakim ara karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Hakim, birle\u015ftirme talebi i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce 5\u2019inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak mahkeme heyetinin dosyada ilerleme kaydedildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle birle\u015ftirmeyi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fini belirtti. Bu nedenle hakim, kamu g\u00f6revlileri dosyas\u0131n\u0131n 5\u2019inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde devam eden dosyayla birle\u015ftirilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmesine h\u00fckmetti. DHA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u0130zmir’in Seferihisar il\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131nda meydana gelen 6.9 b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki depremde 36 ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi\u011fi, 17 ki\u015finin de yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 R\u0131za …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":48410,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[1958,1434,196,505,669],"class_list":["post-48409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-deprem","tag-dosya","tag-izmir","tag-mahkeme","tag-yapi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48409"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48411,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48409\/revisions\/48411"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/48410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}