Uzun y\u0131llar \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olarak kullan\u0131lan ve i\u015fkence vakalar\u0131yla haf\u0131zalara kaz\u0131nan Sansaryan Han\u2019la ilgili \u00f6nemli bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Anayasa Mahkemesi 1930 y\u0131l\u0131nda el konulan han\u0131n 92 y\u0131l sonra Sansaryan Vakf\u0131\u2019na iadesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
A\u011fa Mugradi\u00e7 Sanasariyen (Sansaryan) taraf\u0131ndan 1901 y\u0131l\u0131nda Ermeni milletinin fakir \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011fretim masraflar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gayesiyle kurullan Sansaryan Vakf\u0131\u2019na ait Sansaryan Han,\u00a0 1930 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi taraf\u0131ndan 19030 y\u0131l\u0131nda el konuldu. Han, 1952 y\u0131l\u0131nda da \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ad\u0131na tescil edildi.<\/p>\n
PATR\u0130KL\u0130K DAVA A\u00c7TI<\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye Ermenileri Patrikli\u011fi, 2011\u2019de tescilin iptale talebiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131 ancak dava reddedildi. Patrikli\u011fin temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2017\u2019de mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu. Ancak itiraz \u00fczerine Dairenin bozma karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131 mahkemenin Patriklik alehine verdi\u011fi karar onand\u0131.<\/p>\n Bunun \u00fczerine Sansaryan Vakf\u0131 dosyay\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne ta\u015f\u0131yarak bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n Vak\u0131f ba\u015fvurusunda, vakf\u0131n Ermeni \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011fretim ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla kuruldu\u011fun ve tek m\u00fctevellisinin Patriklik oldu\u011funu kaydetti. Ba\u015fvuruda, \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ad\u0131na 1952 y\u0131l\u0131nda yap\u0131lan tescilin herhangi bir mahkeme karar\u0131na dayanmamas\u0131 sebebiyle yolsuz tescil h\u00fckm\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu savunuldu.<\/p>\n BAKANLI\u011eIN SAVUNMASI<\/p>\n \u0130ddiaya kar\u015f\u0131 bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Sansaryan Han\u2019\u0131n ba\u015fvurunun zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin yetkisinin kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtildi. Bakanl\u0131k ayr\u0131ca kayy\u0131m arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yeni bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilip t\u00fcketilmedi\u011finin tart\u0131\u015flmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etti.<\/p>\n \u201cVAKFIN M\u00dcLK\u0130YET HAKKINA M\u00dcDAHALE KU\u015eKUSUZ\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemede \u015fu tespit ve de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulundu:<\/p>\n \u201cHerkes, m\u00fclkiyet ve miras haklar\u0131na sahiptir. Bu haklar, ancak kamu yarar\u0131 amac\u0131yla, kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 toplum yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.\u201d<\/p>\n Sansaryan Vakf\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iadesini talep etti\u011fi Sansaryan Han\u2019\u0131n 26 May\u0131s 1929 tarihinde vak\u0131f ad\u0131na tescil edildi\u011fi hususunda teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. 10 Haziran 1952 tarihinde \u0130l \u00d6zel \u0130daresi ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan tescilin yolsuz oldu\u011funa dair yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde vakf\u0131n mevcut m\u00fclk\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Vakf\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan bir m\u00fcdahalenin mevcut oldu\u011fu ku\u015fkusuzdur. Di\u011fer taraftan niteli\u011fi ve amac\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde m\u00fcdahalenin m\u00fclkten yoksun b\u0131rakmaya ili\u015fkin kural \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde incelenmesi uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n Vakf\u0131n mazbut vak\u0131f olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak Patrikli\u011fin Vakf\u0131 temsil yetkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinin kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmayan geni\u015fletici yorumuna dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n H\u00dcK\u00dcM: M\u00dcLK\u0130YET HAKKI \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme \u015fu h\u00fckm\u00fc kurdu:<\/p>\n A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130stanbul 13. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine (G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 3\/11\/2022 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ermeni fakir \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n e\u011fitim masraflar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla vakfedilen anacak 1930 y\u0131l\u0131nda devlet taraf\u0131ndan el konulan ve uzun y\u0131llar \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olarak kullan\u0131lan Sansaryan Han, Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131yla 92 y\u0131l sonra Ermeni vakf\u0131na verilecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":62489,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[392,505,6328,10109,8933],"class_list":["post-62488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-basvuru","tag-mahkeme","tag-mulkiyet-hakki","tag-sansaryan","tag-vakfi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62488"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62488\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62490,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62488\/revisions\/62490"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/62489"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}