Fevzi K., 2000 y\u0131l\u0131nda devlet memuru olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131. Memuriyetten \u00f6nce 27 May\u0131s 1997 ile 26 Ekim 1998 tarihleri aras\u0131nda askerlik yapan Fevzi K., 1,5 y\u0131l\u0131 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda bor\u00e7lanarak hizmet s\u00fcresine eklettirdi.<\/p>\n
Fevzi K., 18 ayl\u0131k askerlik s\u00fcresi kadar sigorta ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 s\u00fcresinin geri \u00e7ekilmesi ve emeklilik ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n buna g\u00f6re hesaplanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in SGK Emeklilik Hizmetleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kamu G\u00f6revlileri Tescil ve Hizmet Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n
SGK, Fevzi K.\u2019nin 14 A\u011fustos 2000 tarihinde memuriyete ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bor\u00e7lanmaya konu askerlik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihlerde kamu g\u00f6revinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle talebini reddetti. Fevzi K. da hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi SGK karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile emeklilik tarihinin tazminat ve maa\u015fl\u0131 \u015fekilde 2025 y\u0131l\u0131 olarak d\u00fczeltilmesi i\u00e7in Ankara 18\u2019nci \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n
MAHKEME, SGK KARARINI \u0130PTAL ETT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Ankara 18\u2019inci \u0130dare Mahkemesi, 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 Sosyal Sigortalar ve Genel Sa\u011fl\u0131k Sigortas\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun ilgili maddesine g\u00f6re, erba\u015f veya er olarak silah alt\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrelerin bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmak suretiyle sigortal\u0131l\u0131ktan say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n 5510 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun ilgili maddesi kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funa, bor\u00e7lanmaya ili\u015fkin askerlik g\u00f6revini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihlerde kamu g\u00f6revinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmamas\u0131 nedeniyle verilen ret karar\u0131n\u0131, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f bir k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n \u2018yorum\u2019 yoluyla uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131 kanaatiyle hukuka uygun bulmad\u0131. Kararda, davac\u0131n\u0131n sigortal\u0131l\u0131k s\u00fcresinin, sigorta ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinden\u00a0ba\u015flayarak bor\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 askerlikte ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre kadar geriye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmedildi. SGK\u2019n\u0131n karar\u0131n\u0131 hukuka uygun bulmayan mahkeme, iptal karar\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n \u2018YORUM YOLUYLA UYGULANAMAZ\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n Ankara 18\u2019inci \u0130dare Mahkemesi, b\u00f6ylece Fevzi K.\u2019nin o d\u00f6nem kamu g\u00f6revinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle verilen ret karar\u0131n\u0131, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f bir k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n \u2018yorum\u2019 yoluyla uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmederek iptal etmi\u015f oldu.<\/p>\n \u2018OLMAYAN B\u0130R \u015eEY\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130L HAKKIMI \u0130ST\u0130YORUM\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n Fevzi K., i\u015f\u00e7ilerde bor\u00e7lan\u0131lan askerlik\u00a0s\u00fcresi kadar sigorta ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 s\u00fcresinin geri \u00e7ekildi\u011fini; ancak memurlarda bu i\u015flemin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek, \u201cBu karar Anayasan\u0131n e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131. Anayasada a\u00e7\u0131k ve net. Lehte olan davalarda kanun geriye do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcr, aleyhe olan davalarda y\u00fcr\u00fcmez. Ancak SGK \u0131srarla bu kanunu geriye y\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fcyor. Bu ma\u011fduriyetin bir an \u00f6nce d\u00fczeltilmesini talep ediyorum. Ben olmayan bir \u015feyi de\u011fil hakk\u0131m\u0131 istiyorum\u201d dedi.\u00a0(DHA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 18 ayl\u0131k askerlik s\u00fcresi kadar sigorta ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 s\u00fcresinin geri \u00e7ekilmesi talebi SGK taraf\u0131ndan reddedilen memur Fevzi K, yarg\u0131ya ba\u015fvurdu. \u0130dare Mahkemesi Fevzi K.’y\u0131 hakl\u0131 buldu. Askerlik bor\u00e7lanmas\u0131yla sigorta ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinin geri \u00e7ekilebilmesi EYT aday\u0131 memurlarda reddediliyordu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":63163,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[275,53,2437,783,7474],"class_list":["post-63162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomi","tag-askerlik","tag-kanun","tag-sgk","tag-sigorta","tag-suresi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=63162"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63164,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63162\/revisions\/63164"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/63163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=63162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=63162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=63162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}