Resmi Gazete\u2019nin bug\u00fcnk\u00fc say\u0131s\u0131nda yer alan karara g\u00f6re, ba\u015fvurucu, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131na ait 2014-2015 y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n internet verilerini, log kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131, telefonunun IMEI bilgilerini, a\u00e7\u0131k Wi-Fi noktas\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihleri m\u00fc\u015fterisi oldu\u011fu ileti\u015fim \u015firketinden istedi. \u015eirket, istenen bilgilerin 5 y\u0131l boyunca sakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak mahkeme isterse bu bilgilerin payla\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini belirterek talebi reddetti.<\/p>\n
\u0130stedi\u011fi bilgilerin \u00f6zel hayat\u0131yla ilgili oldu\u011funu, bilgilerin payla\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fduriyet ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ba\u015fvurucu, talebinin kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 ve kendisine tazminat \u00f6denmesi istemiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Davaya bakan \u0130stanbul Anadolu 1. T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi, davan\u0131n reddine karar verdi. Yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun da reddi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, hak ihlali iddias\u0131yla AYM\u2019ye bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20\u2019nci maddesinde yer alan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti. Karar \u00f6rne\u011finin de ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
KARARIN GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130NDEN<\/strong><\/p>\n AYM\u2019nin karar\u0131nda, yerel mahkemenin talepleri bir hak ya da hukuki ili\u015fkiden ziyade maddi verilerle ilgili buldu\u011fu ve t\u00fcketici mahkemesi nezdinde g\u00fcncel bir yarar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetti\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n Hakimin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131, Anayasa\u2019da yer alan temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlere y\u00f6nelik g\u00fcvenceleri \u00f6ncelikle dikkate alarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret edilen kararda, \u201cKi\u015finin kendisiyle ilgili ki\u015fisel veriler hakk\u0131nda bilgilendirilme ve bu verilere eri\u015fme hakk\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan g\u00fcvencelerdir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verildi.<\/p>\n Yerel mahkemenin a\u00e7\u0131lan davada esastan inceleme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n da bu y\u00f6nde oldu\u011fu, bu durumun hak ihlali oldu\u011funa dikkati \u00e7ekilen kararda, \u015fu ifadeler kullan\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n \u201cMevcut ba\u015fvuruda, ba\u015fvurucunun anayasal g\u00fcvencelerden yararlanabilmesini sa\u011flayabilecek nitelikteki a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmemesi teorik olarak mevcut olan bir hukuk yolunun i\u015flevsiz kalmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle bu haliyle teorik d\u00fczeyde etkili g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek bir dava yolu mahkemelerin s\u00f6z konusu yorumu sebebiyle somut olayda ba\u015far\u0131 \u015fans\u0131 sunma kapasitesini yitirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Anayasa Mahkemesi, a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u201d (AA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon hatt\u0131yla ilgili bilgilerin taraf\u0131na verilmesini isteyen ki\u015finin talebinin ileti\u015fim \u015firketi ve mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmesini hak ihlali sayd\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":65112,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[392,170,580,505,3090],"class_list":["post-65111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-teknoloji","tag-basvuru","tag-hak","tag-karar","tag-mahkeme","tag-veriler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=65111"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65113,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65111\/revisions\/65113"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/65112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=65111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=65111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=65111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}