Anayasa Mahkemesi, CHP Grup Ba\u015fkanvekilleri Engin Altay, Engin \u00d6zko\u00e7, \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel ve 133 milletvekilinin 7393 say\u0131l\u0131 Milletvekili Se\u00e7im Kanunu ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun’un iptali istemiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruyu karara ba\u011flad\u0131.<\/p>\n
AYM, s\u00f6z konusu kanunun baz\u0131 maddelerine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurunun bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 oybirli\u011fi ile reddederken bir k\u0131sm\u0131na ili\u015fkin de karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n
AYM, 298 say\u0131l\u0131 Se\u00e7imlerin Temel H\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Se\u00e7men K\u00fct\u00fckleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a eklenen ge\u00e7ici 24’\u00fcnc\u00fc maddedeki \u201c\u0130l se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyeleri ile il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkanlar\u0131, bu maddenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7inde, 15’inci ve 18’inci maddelerde bu maddeyi ihdas eden Kanun’la yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklere g\u00f6re yeniden belirlenir. Bu \u015fekilde belirlenen ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyeler, \u00f6nceki ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerin g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresini tamamlar\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin iptal ba\u015fvurusunu oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddetti.<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu karara AYM Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Z\u00fcht\u00fc Arslan, Ba\u015fkanvekili Hasan Tahsin G\u00f6kcan, \u00fcyeler Engin Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, Emin Kuz ve Yusuf \u015eevki Hakyemez muhalefet \u015ferhi yazd\u0131.<\/p>\n
AYM Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Arslan, muhalefet \u015ferhinde, il ve il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerinin hakimlik teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekerek, konunun se\u00e7im kurulunda g\u00f6rev alan hakimlerin g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi bitmeden g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesini zorunlu k\u0131lan bir hukuki ve fiili zorunlulu\u011fun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcmlendi\u011fini belirtti. Arslan, idari g\u00f6rev yapan kamu g\u00f6revlileri ile hakimlerin aras\u0131nda farkl\u0131l\u0131k bulundu\u011funu vurgular\u0131 ve \u015funlar\u0131 kaydetti:<\/p>\n
\u2013 Daha \u00f6nemlisi, g\u00f6revine son verilen kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin hakim olmas\u0131 durumunda da ifa edilen g\u00f6revin idari veya yarg\u0131sal mahiyette olmas\u0131 da farkl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme yapmay\u0131 gerektirebilmektedir\u2026 \u0130dari nitelikteki her \u2018yap\u0131sal’ de\u011fi\u015fiklik, hakimlerin yarg\u0131sal g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesini gerektiren hukuki ve fiili zorunluluk hali olarak kabul edilemez. B\u00f6yle bir zorunluluk, ancak hakimlerin g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131klar\u0131 mahkeme veya kurullar\u0131n\u0131 kard\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da yarg\u0131 birli\u011fi kapsam\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi gibi son derece k\u00f6kl\u00fc yap\u0131sal de\u011fi\u015fiklikler sonucunda g\u00fcndeme gelebilir.<\/p>\n
YAPISAL DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K MAH\u0130YET\u0130NDE DE\u011e\u0130L<\/strong><\/p>\n \u2013 Ancak, bu mahiyette bir yap\u0131sal de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin beraberinde getirdi\u011fi hukuki ve fiili zorunlulu\u011fun bulunmas\u0131 durumunda da son \u00e7are olarak yap\u0131lacak m\u00fcdahalenin yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hakimlik teminat\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 di\u011fer g\u00fcvenceleri koruyacak \u015fekilde \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir\u2026 Se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131ndaki ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerin se\u00e7ilme usul\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015fmesi, k\u0131dem esas\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenen ve iki y\u0131l boyunca g\u00f6rev yapmas\u0131 beklenen ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerin g\u00f6revlerine son verilmesini zorunlu k\u0131lan yap\u0131sal de\u011fi\u015fiklik mahiyetinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n \u2013 Se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumunda ve g\u00f6revlerinde herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ng\u00f6rmeyen kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin yap\u0131sal nitelikte oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle her durumda hakimlerden olu\u015fan il se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyeleri ile il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u2018k\u0131dem’ yerine \u2018ad \u00e7ekme’ y\u00f6ntemiyle belirlenecek olmas\u0131, daha \u00f6nce k\u0131dem esas\u0131na g\u00f6re 2 y\u0131l g\u00f6rev yapmak \u00fczere olu\u015fturulmu\u015f bulunan mevcut se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerinin g\u00f6revlerini sona erdirmeyi gerektiren hukuki ve fiili bir zorunluluk olarak de\u011ferlendirilemez.<\/p>\n \u201cYARGI BA\u011eIMSIZLI\u011eI \u0130LE BA\u011eDA\u015eMAZ\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u2013 Dava konusu kural, yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvenceye alan Anayasa’n\u0131n 138’inci maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n temel amac\u0131, hakimin \u00e7ekinmeden ve endi\u015fe duymadan \u2018her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kayg\u0131dan, maddi ve manevi bask\u0131 ve etki olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan uzak’ ve tarafs\u0131z bir \u015fekilde \u2018\u00f6zg\u00fcrce karar verebilmesini’ sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda, kanun koyucunun hakimlik teminat\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerinin g\u00f6revlerine son vermeye y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalelerinin yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 zordur. Di\u011fer yandan, g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi dolmam\u0131\u015f olan se\u00e7im kurullar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyelerinin g\u00f6revlerine kanunla son verilmesi, kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesiyle de ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anayasa Mahkemesi, CHP\u2019nin il se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyeleri ile il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulu ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n “k\u0131deme g\u00f6re” de\u011fil de “ad \u00e7ekme” y\u00f6ntemiyle belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin iptal ba\u015fvurusunu oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddetti. Karara AYM Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Z\u00fcht\u00fc Arslan, Ba\u015fkanvekili Hasan Tahsin G\u00f6kcan ile \u00fc\u00e7 \u00fcye muhalefet \u015ferhi yazd\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":67289,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[443,6504,2632,53,3220],"class_list":["post-67288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-baskan","tag-degisiklik","tag-hakim","tag-kanun","tag-zorunlu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67288"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67288\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67290,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67288\/revisions\/67290"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/67289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}