Resmi Gazete\u2019nin bug\u00fcnk\u00fc say\u0131s\u0131nda yer alan karara g\u00f6re, Osmanl\u0131 Devleti d\u00f6neminde 1722\u2019de Adana\u2019da kurulan ve y\u00f6netimi Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde olan bir vakf\u0131n vakfiyesinde, \u201cvak\u0131f\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra bat\u0131n tertibi \u00fczere erkek evlatlar\u0131 e\u015fit olarak mutasarr\u0131f olacak, erkek evlatlar\u0131ndan kimse kalmaz ise veraset tertibi \u00fczere k\u0131z evlatlar\u0131 mutasarr\u0131f olacakt\u0131r\u201d \u015fart\u0131 yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n
Burduro\u011flu \u0130brahim\u2019in Menzili ve D\u00fckkanlar\u0131 Vakf\u0131 olarak bilinen \u201cEl-Hac Ebubekir ve \u0130brahim Be\u015fe bin Topal Mehmet A\u011fa Vakf\u0131\u201dn\u0131n\u00a0miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan Z.Y, 2012\u2019de vakf\u0131n gelirlerinden yararlanma hakk\u0131 olan evlatlar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu belirterek, bunun tespiti i\u00e7in Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 Adana 7. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Erkek karde\u015fi Y.\u00c7\u2019nin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada, Adana 6. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin galle fazlas\u0131ndan yararlanmas\u0131na karar verdi\u011fini ifade eden Z.Y, 2013\u2019te vefat etti. Z.Y\u2019nin kad\u0131n olan miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 davay\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc ancak Adana 7. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, vakfiyede belirtilen hususlar nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n karar\u0131 onamas\u0131 \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular, galle fazlas\u0131ndan vakfedenin kad\u0131n alt soylar\u0131n\u0131n yararlanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek AYM\u2019ye bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35\u2019inci maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10\u2019uncu maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n
\u201cC\u0130NS\u0130YET TEMEL\u0130NDE FARKLI MUAMELE\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n AYM\u2019nin karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuru konusu olay\u0131n miras hukuku sorunu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, galle fazlas\u0131n\u0131n da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu ve vakfiye \u015fartlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131. Kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n vakfedenin iradesini koruma amac\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fctmesinin anla\u015f\u0131labilir oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edilen kararda, \u201cBununla birlikte vakfedenin iradesine sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi ve hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131z evlatlar\u0131na galle fazlas\u0131ndan pay verilmemesini hakl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131racak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde y\u00fcksek bir kamu yarar\u0131 bar\u0131nd\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.\u201d ifadeleri kullan\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n \u201cG\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde cinsiyet temelli ayr\u0131mlar hem uluslararas\u0131 hukuk hem de ulusal hukuk d\u00fczeylerinde yasaklanm\u0131\u015f ve devletlere cinsiyet temelli olarak farkl\u0131 muamelelerde bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemeye y\u00f6nelik tedbirler alma \u00f6devi y\u00fcklenmi\u015ftir.\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesine yer verilen kararda, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10\u2019uncu maddesi gere\u011fi cinsiyet temelli farkl\u0131 muameleye m\u00fcsamaha g\u00f6sterilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuru konusu olay\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla da ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu, mahkemece verilen karar\u0131n ihlal anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fine i\u015faret edilen kararda, \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/p>\n \u201cGalle fazlas\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n vakfedenin k\u0131z evlad\u0131 olan murisine ayn\u0131 bat\u0131ndan ya\u015fayan erkek evlad\u0131n bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle pay verilmemesi suretiyle cinsiyet temelinde yap\u0131lan farkl\u0131 muamelenin makul ve hakl\u0131 bir sebebi bulunsa da ama\u00e7 ile ara\u00e7 aras\u0131nda makul bir orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ili\u015fkisine dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etti\u011fi kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u201d AA<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), bir vakf\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hizmetlerden arta kalan miktar anlam\u0131na gelen “galle fazlas\u0131”ndan vakfedenin kad\u0131n alt soylar\u0131n\u0131n yararlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuruda, ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":67544,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[392,596,775,296,580],"class_list":["post-67543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-basvuru","tag-cinsiyet","tag-dava","tag-hukuk","tag-karar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67543"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67545,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67543\/revisions\/67545"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/67544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Bu durumun cinsiyet temelinde farkl\u0131 muamele oldu\u011fu belirtilen kararda, \u201cSomut olaydaki farkl\u0131 muamelenin vakfedenin iradesine sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi ve hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d tespiti yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n