\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ter\u00f6r ve \u00d6rg\u00fctl\u00fc Su\u00e7lar Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosunca haz\u0131rlanan 55 sayfal\u0131k iddianame, \u0130stanbul 31. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130ddianamede, aralar\u0131nda eski Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Murat Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu 3\u2019\u00fc tutuklu 16 ki\u015fi \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheli\u201d, 20 ki\u015fi \u201cm\u00fc\u015fteki\u201d, 1 ki\u015fi ise \u201cm\u00fc\u015fteki-\u015f\u00fcpheli\u201d olarak yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n
SORU\u015eTURMA M\u00dcFETT\u0130\u015e RAPORUYLA BA\u015eLADI<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fclkiye m\u00fcfetti\u015flerince haz\u0131rlanan raporda, Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u201cirtikap\u201d ve \u201cr\u00fc\u015fvet\u201d su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu, bunun \u00fczerine soru\u015fturmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda dinleme kararlar\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilen iddianamede, i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edilen r\u00fc\u015fvet olaylar\u0131 tek tek eylemler \u015feklinde ele al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, Murat Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n 2014 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yerel se\u00e7imlerde Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak se\u00e7ildi\u011fi, Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olduktan sonra imar i\u015flerinden sorumlu ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olarak Meclis \u00dcyesi H\u00fcseyin Avni Sipahi\u2019yi g\u00f6revlendirdi\u011fi bildirildi.<\/p>\n Sipahi\u2019nin hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar olmas\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6revinden al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in partiden Hazinedar\u2019a bask\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n ise bu bask\u0131lara dayanamayarak Sipahi\u2019yi ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlat\u0131lan iddianamede, Sipahi\u2019nin yerine imar i\u015flerinden sorumlu ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olarak Rifat \u00d6rnek\u2019in atand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n \u201c\u0130MAR ONAYI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N BELTA\u015e VAKFINA PARA YATIRMA \u015eARTI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, bu atama \u00fczerine Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesinde imar konular\u0131ndan sorumlu ki\u015finin Belediye Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 san\u0131k Rifat \u00d6rnek oldu\u011fu belirtilerek, resmiyette yetkisi olmayan Sipahi\u2019ye de belediyenin 4\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc kat\u0131nda \u00f6zel bir makam odas\u0131 tahsis edildi\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n \u0130mar ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n evrak i\u015flemleri tamamland\u0131ktan sonra san\u0131klardan Rifat \u00d6rnek\u2019e onay i\u015flemine gitmeden \u00f6nce Belediye Meclis \u00dcyesi H\u00fcseyin Avni Sipahi\u2019nin onay\u0131ndan ge\u00e7mesinin istendi\u011fine dikkati \u00e7ekilen iddianamede, bu nedenle imar konular\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n ilk olarak Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesi \u0130mar ve \u015eehircilik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne gitti\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, evraklar\u0131 eksik olmayan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n i\u015flemleri tamamland\u0131ktan sonra Sipahi\u2019nin dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 san\u0131k U\u011fur \u015eahin taraf\u0131ndan imar ba\u015fvuru evraklar\u0131 al\u0131narak Sipahi\u2019ye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ifade edildi.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, dan\u0131\u015fman U\u011fur \u015eahin\u2019in talimat \u00fczerine imar evraklar\u0131 tam olan ve onaylanmas\u0131 gereken ba\u015fvuru sahiplerini arayarak Sipahi\u2019nin makam\u0131na g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme i\u00e7in \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131larak, san\u0131k H\u00fcseyin Avni Sipahi\u2019nin, makam\u0131na gelen ba\u015fvuru sahibine g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u201cimar evraklar\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesi Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131na para yat\u0131rmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksi takdirde imar evraklar\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d s\u00f6yledi\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n \u201cZORLA BA\u011eI\u015e TOPLANDI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin \u00e7o\u011funun imar evraklar\u0131n\u0131n onaylanmamas\u0131 halinde zarara u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131na para yat\u0131rmaya r\u0131za g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ve zorla para yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlat\u0131lan iddianamede, para yat\u0131rmak zorunda kalan ki\u015filere U\u011fur \u015eahin taraf\u0131ndan Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131na ait hesap numaras\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n belirtilen hesap numaras\u0131na para yat\u0131r\u0131p getirip dekontu U\u011fur \u015eahin\u2019e teslim ettikleri belirtildi.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, para yat\u0131rma dekontunun dan\u0131\u015fman U\u011fur \u015eahin taraf\u0131ndan teslim al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00fczerine imar ba\u015fvuru evraklar\u0131n\u0131n Sipahi\u2019nin talimat\u0131yla imar konular\u0131ndan resmiyette sorumlu olan Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Rifat \u00d6rnek\u2019e g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n San\u0131k Sipahi\u2019ye d\u00f6nemin Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 san\u0131k Murat Hazinedar taraf\u0131ndan yasal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde imar konular\u0131nda fiili olarak denetim yapma yetkisi verildi\u011fine dikkati \u00e7ekilen iddianamede, Sipahi’nin d\u00fcz bir meclis \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu halde yetkisiz ve sorumsuz olarak Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesinde imar konular\u0131nda \u201ckilit isim\u201d oldu\u011fu aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n M\u00fc\u015ftekilerden \u201cba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u201d ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda toplanan paralar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun ve hukuk kurallar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde harcanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisine yer verilen iddianamede, yat\u0131r\u0131lan paralar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131 M\u00fctevelli \u00dcyesi olan Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131na \u201chuzur hakk\u0131\u201d ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n Bu san\u0131klar\u0131n akrabalar\u0131 veya dostlar\u0131na da, Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131nda dan\u0131\u015fman ve avukat s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilerek maa\u015f \u00f6demesi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na yer verilen iddianamede, Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131nda bir\u00e7ok ki\u015finin \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor g\u00f6z\u00fckmesine ra\u011fmen vakf\u0131n hi\u00e7bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n ve faaliyet alan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n Vakfa para yat\u0131rmadan evraklar\u0131 tam olan ve ruhsat almas\u0131na herhangi bir engel bulunmayan i\u015f yerlerine ruhsat verilmedi\u011fi belirtilen iddianamede, Belta\u015f Vakf\u0131na \u201cba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u201d ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda para yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde hi\u00e7bir evrak talep edilmeden ve \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flay\u0131p sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmadan i\u015f yerlerine ruhsat verildi\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, \u201cBa\u015fkan Murat Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesini bir \u015firket gibi y\u00f6netti\u011fi, Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesine kendi e\u015f ve dostlar\u0131n\u0131 alarak aile \u015firketi stat\u00fcs\u00fcne soktu\u011fu, daha sonra aile \u015firketi stat\u00fcs\u00fcne getirdi\u011fi belediyeyi halka hizmet etmekten \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p ticarethane gibi i\u015fletmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, halk\u0131n her ba\u015fvurusunda i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in \u2018ba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u2019 yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu tuttu\u011fu, bu durumun dosyada bulunan ba\u015fvuru evraklar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki beyanlar\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, san\u0131k Rifat \u00d6rnek ve Mehmet U\u011fur \u015eahin\u2019in ikrara dayanan beyanlar\u0131 ve tape kay\u0131tlar\u0131yla sabit oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesine yer verildi.<\/p>\n SANIKLAR HAKINDA \u0130STENEN CEZALAR<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianamede, Hazinedar\u2019\u0131n 8 kez \u201cirtikap su\u00e7una te\u015febb\u00fcs etmek\u201d su\u00e7undan 20 y\u0131ldan 40 y\u0131la kadar, 8 kez \u201cirtikap\u201d su\u00e7undan 40 y\u0131ldan 80 y\u0131la kadar, 2 kez \u201cr\u00fc\u015fvet\u201d su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131ldan 24 y\u0131la ve 5 kez \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak\u201d su\u00e7undan 2,5 y\u0131ldan 10 y\u0131la kadar olmak \u00fczere toplamda 70 y\u0131l 6 aydan 154 y\u0131la kadar hapsi istendi.<\/p>\n Ayn\u0131 su\u00e7lardan tutuklu san\u0131klardan eski Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 H\u00fcseyin Avni Sipahi\u2019nin 43,5 y\u0131ldan 96 y\u0131la kadar, tutuksuz san\u0131k eski Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Rifat \u00d6rnek\u2019in 29 y\u0131ldan 62 y\u0131la kadar, tutuklu san\u0131k \u00c7etin K\u0131r\u0131\u015fgil\u2019in de 10 y\u0131ldan 20 y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi aktar\u0131lan iddianamede, di\u011fer san\u0131klara 4 y\u0131l ile 37 y\u0131l aras\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fen s\u00fcrelerde hapis cezas\u0131 verilmesi talep edildi. (AA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesine y\u00f6nelik “r\u00fc\u015fvet” ve “irtikap” su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda aralar\u0131nda eski Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Murat Hazinedar’\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu 17 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":73943,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[392,10754,9204,790,83],"class_list":["post-73942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-basvuru","tag-besiktas-belediye","tag-evrak","tag-imar","tag-is"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73942"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73944,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73942\/revisions\/73944"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/73943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}