Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), sendikan\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 grev karar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmet taraf\u0131ndan ertelenmesi nedeniyle i\u015f yava\u015flatma eylemine kat\u0131lan bir i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesinin hak ihlali oldu\u011funu belirledi.<\/p>\n
Grev ertelemesine kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015f yava\u015flatma eylemine kat\u0131lan Birle\u015fik Metal \u0130\u015f sendikas\u0131na \u00fcye bir i\u015f\u00e7inin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada karar birli\u011fi ile al\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015e YAVA\u015eLATMA EYLEM\u0130NE KATILDI\u011eI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N \u0130\u015eTEN ATILDI<\/b><\/p>\n
2015 y\u0131l\u0131 ocak ay\u0131nda metal i\u015f kolunda faaliyet g\u00f6steren bir i\u015f yeri ile sendika aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinde sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namamas\u0131 neticesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmek istenen grev, h\u00fck\u00fcmetin \u2018grev erteleme\u2019 karar\u0131 nedeniyle uygulamaya konulamad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Erteleme karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 i\u015fyerindeki i\u015f\u00e7iler g\u00fcnde 20-25 dakika s\u00fcren i\u015f yava\u015flatma eylemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi. \u0130\u015fyeri bu olay\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 30 i\u015f\u00e7iyi tazminats\u0131z bir \u015fekilde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi, i\u015fe iade karar\u0131 verirken sendikal tazminat talebini ise reddetti. \u0130\u015fveren karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay\u2019da temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcrken \u00fcst mahkeme i\u015f akdinin feshini hakl\u0131 buldu.<\/p>\n
TAZM\u0130NAT \u00d6DENECEK<\/b><\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu i\u015f\u00e7i Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan AYM\u2019ye bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu. AYM, i\u015f\u00e7inin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vererek tazminata h\u00fckmetti. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini belirterek 18 bin TL tazminata h\u00fckmetti ve davan\u0131n i\u015f mahkemesine yeniden g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
AYM, daha \u00f6nce Birle\u015fik Metal \u0130\u015f\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131n\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 grev karar\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesinde sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verdi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatarak yerel mahkemenin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi etkili bir yarg\u0131sal inceleme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n
\u2018SEND\u0130KA HAKKINA M\u00dcDAHALE\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
Kararda \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/p>\n
\u201cAnasaya\u2019n\u0131n 54. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re T\u0130S g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 halinde i\u015f\u00e7iler grev hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla grev hakk\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ekonomik ve sosyal taleplerini dile getirmelerini sa\u011flayan en g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc i\u015f m\u00fccadelesi ara\u00e7lar\u0131ndan biridir.<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa\u2019m\u0131n 54. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda grevin ertelenebilece\u011fi haller ve i\u015fyerlerinin kanunla d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Anayasal g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan grev hakk\u0131n\u0131n ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nem dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hakk\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 zorlay\u0131c\u0131 nedenin inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ve a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kla ortaya konmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Aksi halde anayasal bir hak olan grev ve toplu s\u00f6zle\u015fme hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 fiilen anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le gelmektedir.<\/p>\n
\u2018TOLERANS G\u00d6STER\u0130LMEL\u0130\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
Bu itibarla i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ekonomik, sosyal ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 etkileyen uygulamalara y\u00f6nelik k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli, demokratik bir hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131 niteli\u011findeki protesto eylemlerine tolerans g\u00f6sterilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u0130ncelenen ba\u015fvuruda Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131zca grev erteleme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun kanunsuz eylemde bulundu\u011funu ve i\u015f akdinin ge\u00e7erli nedenle feshedildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f; daha ileri bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesinin ba\u015fvuruya konu grev erteleme karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna varmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemin de T\u0130S\u2019e ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n dile getirilmesi amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik, k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli ve bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda an\u0131lan eylem sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kapsam\u0131nda somut ba\u015fvuruda i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun sendika hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin onun ve ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n sendika haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir etkiye neden olaca\u011f\u0131, buna kar\u015f\u0131n derece mahkemelerince s\u00f6z konusu anayasal hakk\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi etkili bir yarg\u0131sal inceleme yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getiremedi\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Anayasa Mahkemesi, 2015’te Bakanlar Kurulu’nun ‘grev yasa\u011f\u0131’ karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015f yava\u015flatma eylemine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015ften at\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7inin sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini belirledi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":85483,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[522,170,83,580,3565],"class_list":["post-85482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomi","tag-grev","tag-hak","tag-is","tag-karar","tag-sendika"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=85482"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85484,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85482\/revisions\/85484"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/85483"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=85482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=85482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=85482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}