Osmanl\u0131 Devleti d\u00f6neminde M\u0131s\u0131r k\u00f6kenli Ortodokslar\u0131n dini merkezlerinden olan Sina Aziz Manast\u0131r\u0131 ve Ba\u015fpiskoposlu\u011fu\u2019na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u0130stanbul\u2019un Balat semtinde Aya Yani Kilisesi ve Manast\u0131r\u0131 kuruldu.<\/p>\n
M\u0131s\u0131r\u2019\u0131n Osmanl\u0131 Devletinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131, 1923\u2019te de T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Devleti\u2019nin kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik 1935\u2019te 2762 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Vak\u0131flar Kanunu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u201cMAZBUT VAKIFLAR\u201d ARASINA ALINDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Kanunla vak\u0131flar\u0131n mal edinmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ildi. Ayr\u0131ca vakfedenin soyundan gelen \u00f6zel bir y\u00f6neticisi olmayan ve Evkaf Nezareti taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilen vak\u0131flar, mazbut vak\u0131flar (y\u00f6netimi idareye ge\u00e7en vak\u0131flar) olarak adland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. 1936 Beyannamesi olarak bilinen beyannameyle de vak\u0131flara mal bildiriminde bulunmalar\u0131 istendi.<\/p>\n Vak\u0131flar \u0130daresi taraf\u0131ndan 1977\u2019de yap\u0131lan tefti\u015f sonucu d\u00fczenlenen rapor uyar\u0131nca kilise ve arazisi, mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131. 2002\u2019de yap\u0131lan yasal de\u011fi\u015fiklikle ise cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n mal edinmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcndeki engel kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Daha \u00f6nce kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nanlar\u0131n, ba\u015fvuru halinde iadesine imkan tan\u0131nd\u0131.<\/p>\n Bunun \u00fczerine, Sina Aziz Manast\u0131r\u0131 ve Ba\u015fpiskoposlu\u011fu, vakf\u0131n mazbut halinin sona erdirilerek y\u00f6netiminin tekrar cemaatlerine b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n da cemaatten olu\u015fturulacak vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimine iade edilmesi talep etti.<\/p>\n B\u0130REYSEL BA\u015eVURUDA BULUNDULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130darenin, yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruya cevap vermeyerek, ba\u015fvuruyu z\u0131mnen reddetmesi \u00fczerine, Ba\u015fpiskoposluk, konuyu mahkemeye ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. A\u00e7\u0131lan davada, yerel mahkeme ret karar\u0131 verdi, Dan\u0131\u015ftay da bu karar\u0131 hukuka uygun buldu. Bunun \u00fczerine Ba\u015fpiskoposluk, Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36\u2019nc\u0131 maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35\u2019inci maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ad\u0131na yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere, karar \u00f6rne\u011finin yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n \u201cMAL\u0130K\u0130N TASARRUF YETK\u0130S\u0130 KISITLANDI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkemenin karar\u0131nda, Vak\u0131flar \u0130daresi karar\u0131yla kilise ve arazisinin mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, y\u00f6netimin idareye ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen bu durumun, tapudaki m\u00fclkiyeti ortadan kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201cancak malikin tasarruf yetkisini k\u0131s\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d ifade edildi.<\/p>\n Kilise ve manast\u0131r\u0131n, 1936 Beyannamesi uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcstakil bir vak\u0131f niteli\u011fi kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131, 1977\u2019de mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 aktar\u0131lan kararda, cemaat vakf\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclen kilisenin ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n 5404 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca, mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na imkan kalmayan bir vakf\u0131n mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na nas\u0131l al\u0131nabildi\u011finin yerel mahkeme ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan verilen ret kararlar\u0131nda yeterince a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 aktar\u0131lan kararda, iade talebinin ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmenin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirildi.<\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkemenin karar\u0131nda, \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi:<\/p>\n \u201c1977 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar cemaati taraf\u0131ndan fiilen kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bizzat idarece tespit edilen kilise ve arsas\u0131ndan ibaret oldu\u011fu belirtilen bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayan\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n idarenin tek tarafl\u0131 i\u015flemiyle mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na al\u0131narak y\u00f6netimine el konuldu\u011fu ve iade talebinin de bu idari i\u015fleme dayal\u0131 olarak reddedildi\u011fi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen ba\u015fvuruda, ba\u015fvurucunun davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k yan\u0131t gerektiren m\u00fcdahalenin kanunili\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia ve itirazlar\u0131 mahkemelerce ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131tlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n M\u00dcLK\u0130YET HAKKI \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Ayr\u0131ca idari i\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 1936 Beyannamesinin verildi\u011fi tarihten uzun y\u0131llar sonra ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bir i\u00e7tihada dayal\u0131 olarak bu beyanname uyar\u0131nca dini faaliyete konu mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcstakil bir vak\u0131f olarak kabul\u00fc ile mazbut vak\u0131flar aras\u0131na alma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki uygulama da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesi a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.\u201d (AA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\u0131s\u0131r’daki Sina Aziz Manast\u0131r\u0131 ve Ba\u015fpiskoposlu\u011fu, \u0130stanbul’da bulunan Osmanl\u0131 d\u00f6neminde kendilerine ba\u011fl\u0131 olan \u0130stanbul’daki Aya Yani Kilisesi’nin iadesini istedi. Red karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 Ba\u015fpiskoposluk, Anayasa Mahkemesi’ne bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu. AYM’nin karar\u0131 bug\u00fcnk\u00fc Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131nland\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":85623,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[392,580,3837,505,4256],"class_list":["post-85622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-basvuru","tag-karar","tag-kilise","tag-mahkeme","tag-vakiflar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=85622"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85624,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622\/revisions\/85624"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/85623"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=85622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=85622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=85622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}