Merkez Kayap\u0131nar il\u00e7esinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zel hastanede 2 y\u0131l \u00f6nce misafire \u201csallama\u201d \u00e7ay ikram gerek\u00e7esiyle y\u00f6neticisiyle \u00e7\u0131kan tart\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan Mehmet K\u0131z\u0131lta\u015f, Diyarbak\u0131r 3. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesinde haklar\u0131n\u0131n iadesine ili\u015fkin dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n
Avukat Hanifi Kandemir taraf\u0131ndan mahkemeye sunulan dilek\u00e7ede, m\u00fcvekkili K\u0131z\u0131lta\u015f\u2019\u0131n 20 Haziran 2013\u2019te daval\u0131 \u015firkette a\u015f\u00e7\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f akdinin 19 Ekim 2021\u2019de feshedildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n
Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc y\u00f6neticisinin \u00e7ay\u0131n demli olmamas\u0131 ve haz\u0131r sallama \u00e7ay kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle K\u0131z\u0131lta\u015f\u2019\u0131 azarlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen dilek\u00e7ede, \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi:<\/p>\n
*M\u00fcvekkil, y\u00f6neticiye g\u00fcnd\u00fcz talimat gere\u011fi demleme \u00e7ay yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Buna ra\u011fmen m\u00fcvekkil azarlanmas\u0131na ve i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesi tehdidine ra\u011fmen hakaret ve fiziki m\u00fcdahalede bulunmadan tepkisini g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
*B\u00f6yle basit bir mevzu i\u00e7in \u00e7ocuk gibi azarlan\u0131p tahrik edilen m\u00fcvekkilin i\u015f akdi feshedilmi\u015ftir. Yasayla belirlenmi\u015f herhangi bir i\u015f akdinin feshi yokken bu \u015fekilde i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
*Haks\u0131z \u015fekilde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan m\u00fcvekkilin i\u015fine d\u00f6nmesi i\u00e7in i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma mecburiyetimiz do\u011fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Dilek\u00e7ede, i\u015f akdinin feshini ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespiti karar\u0131yla \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun 21. maddesi gere\u011fi i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131, ba\u015flat\u0131lmamas\u0131 halinde m\u00fcvekkile 8 ayl\u0131k \u00fccreti tutar\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6denmesi, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015ftirilmesine kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreler i\u00e7in de m\u00fcvekkile 4 ayl\u0131k \u00fccret talep edildi.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 taraf ise verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7ede, \u201cS\u00f6zle\u015fmenin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, davan\u0131n mesnetsiz, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve hukuki dayanaktan yoksun oldu\u011funu\u201d \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n
Diyarbak\u0131r 3. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi, K\u0131z\u0131lta\u015f\u2019\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada i\u015fverenin 77 bin 340 lira tazminat \u00f6demesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n
GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARDAN<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda \u015fu ifadeler kullan\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n *Davac\u0131 ve y\u00f6netici aras\u0131nda i\u015fyerine gelen bir misafire \u00e7ay ikram edilmesi gibi basit bir konuda tart\u0131\u015fma ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n *Davac\u0131, y\u00f6neticiye y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir m\u00fcdahale ve sata\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Feshin eyleme oranla a\u011f\u0131r kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, son \u00e7are olarak ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 gereken bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m olmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda al\u0131nabilecek ba\u015fkaca \u00f6nlemler ve uygulanabilecek ba\u015fka yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar dikkate al\u0131nmadan do\u011frudan fesih yolunun tercih edilmesi, haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu kanaati olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur. Bu nedenlerle davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n i\u015fe iade talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Mahkeme, davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131demini g\u00f6zeterek, bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirlenen miktarlar\u0131 dikkate alarak 5 ayl\u0131k br\u00fct \u00fccreti toplam tutar\u0131 olan 60 bin 140 lira i\u015fe ba\u015flatmama tazminat\u0131, 4 ayl\u0131k ise bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre br\u00fct \u00fccreti 17 bin 200 lira daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak, davac\u0131ya verilmesine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n Karara itirazda bulunan daval\u0131lar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu de\u011ferlendiren Diyarbak\u0131r B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 7. Hukuk Dairesi, ilk derece mahkemesinin hukuki de\u011ferlendirmesinde usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek, daval\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar verdi.<\/p>\n \u201c\u015e\u0130RKET HESABIMIZA PARAYI AKTARDI\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Karara ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmede bulunan avukat Kandemir, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00f6zel bir hastanede a\u015f\u00e7\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken gelen bir misafire \u201cdemleme\u201d yerine \u201csallama\u201d \u00e7ay vermesinden dolay\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015f yerinde 8 y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan olan m\u00fcvekkilinin yap\u0131lan fesihten kaynakl\u0131 taraf\u0131na m\u00fcracaatta bulundu\u011funu belirten Kandemir, \u015funlar\u0131 kaydetti:<\/p>\n *\u0130\u015f mahkemesinde feshin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirterek, birtak\u0131m tazminat kalemleri i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7t\u0131k.<\/p>\n *Yerel mahkeme yap\u0131lan feshin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu, gelen misafire demleme \u00e7ay yerine sallama \u00e7ay verilmesinin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshini sonucunu do\u011furmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n *M\u00fcvekkiline bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre \u00fccreti ve ba\u015fvurumuz \u00fczerine noter vas\u0131tas\u0131yla i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in tazminata h\u00fckmetti. \u0130\u015fe iade davas\u0131 sonucunda noter vas\u0131tas\u0131yla \u015firkete ihtar \u00e7ektik.<\/p>\n *\u015eirket hesab\u0131m\u0131za paray\u0131 aktard\u0131. Fesih haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z davam\u0131z devam ediyor.<\/p>\n \u201c\u0130\u015eVERENLER \u0130\u015e S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMES\u0130NE FESHETMEDEN \u00d6NCE \u0130K\u0130 DEFA D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNS\u00dcN\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Bu karar\u0131 olumlu bulduklar\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden Kandemir, konu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yle s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc:<\/p>\n *Zira 8 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7ok basit bir sorundan kaynakl\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedilmesi hukuka ve vicdana ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n *Yap\u0131lan fesihle eylem aras\u0131nda bir orant\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 net \u015fekilde ortay\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverenin m\u00fcvekkili olan i\u015f\u00e7iyi demleme \u00e7ay mevzusundan kaynakl\u0131 olarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetmesi ve akabinde yerel mahkemenin yap\u0131lan feshin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funu ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmesi bizim i\u00e7in yerinde bir karard\u0131r.<\/p>\n *Ayn\u0131 zamanda Diyarbak\u0131r B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi de verilen karar\u0131n do\u011fru oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015fveren vekillerinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti.<\/p>\n *Bu karar bizim i\u00e7in emsal niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fverenler i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetmeden \u00f6nce iki defa d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeleri gerekti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. (AA)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Diyarbak\u0131r’da \u00f6zel bir hastanenin yemek firmas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken misafire “demleme” yerine “sallama” \u00e7ay verdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan i\u015f\u00e7i, hukuk m\u00fccadelesini kazand\u0131. Mahkeme, i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7iye 77 bin 340 lira tazminat \u00f6demesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":97696,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[584,775,12380,83,580],"class_list":["post-97695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","tag-cay","tag-dava","tag-feshi","tag-is","tag-karar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=97695"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97695\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":97697,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97695\/revisions\/97697"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/97696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=97695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=97695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberulus.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=97695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}